Many years were spent debating whether or not advocates should be allowed to approach the public directly. Historically members of the public would brief an attorney who would then approach an advocate to argue a case before a court. This was known as the “referral system”. Finally the Minister of Justice publicised the DOJ’s plans to permit advocates to see clients directly to have one Act which regulates the whole legal profession, namely the Legal Practice Act.
There was a divided view on this issue for a long time. The main opposing views were that some felt the introduction of the Legal Practice Act would repeal legislation which was traditionally separate for attorneys and advocates namely, the Attorneys Act and the Admission of Advocates Act and that the proposed commonality would wipe out the advocate profession. The fear was, there would be no distinction anymore between attorneys and advocates (generalists and specialists).
Others felt the introduction of the Legal Practice Act would mean Advocates could finally enjoy the benefits of receiving more work rather than only being briefed only when the need arose. What this meant was, that attorneys would no longer play “middle man” between the public and advocates and this gave the public a choice in who to approach as their legal representative.
It was said that this direct approach could save legal fees as the referral system was costly and entailed forking out double fees for two lawyers to assist on one matter.
The nett effect of passing the Act now means that The South African Legal Practice Council regulates all legal practitioners under a single independent body – the Council.
With pros came the cons, under the referral system advocates did not need to operate trust accounts. Advocates would not handle administration (FICA) or trust monies (financial matters) – they were briefed and paid by the attorney who had to see to it that all that criteria was met.
Now advocates seeing clients directly must operate trust accounts. To convert from a “referral advocate” to a “trust account advocate”, he/she needs to make application to the Legal Practice Council in terms of rules 30.2 and 30.4 and 32.2.
The advocate applicant must in a separate statement furnish the following information to the Council:
- Proof of every court in which he/she has been admitted in, and an indication that he/she has not been admitted in any other court.
- A certificate signed by the registrar of every High court to which he/she applied for admission to practice, to the effect that no proceedings are pending or are contemplated to strike his/ her name from the roll or to suspend him/her from practice.
- Proof that he/she has the knowledge of accounting necessary for the keeping of accounting records referred to in Section 87 of the Legal Practice Act and for compliance with the accounting rules published by the Council from time to time.
- Proof that he/she has completed training pertaining to attorneys’ bookkeeping as required in Rule 32.2.1. 4.
- Proof that he/she has attended a legal practice management training course as contemplated by Section 85(1)(b) read with Rule 27.1 of the Legal Practice Act.
- Proof of payment of the prescribed fee published by the Council from time to time.
- Proof of enrolment as an advocate.
Advocates converting now also enjoy PI cover under the Legal Practitioners Indemnity Insurance Fund (LPIIF) Master policy, as a sole practitioner with R1 562 500 cover per year. This also means far more Advocates are taking appointments as curators and trustees, the usual business of attorneys.
Share this article
Short Answer: Yes, you can get retroactive cover. It’s important to note that various insurers may have distinct criteria or prerequisites concerning retroactive cover and dates. You should canvass this with your broker prior to taking out a PI policy. Retroactive cover is an important aspect of Professional Indemnity (PI) insurance. This type of cover…
While this list is not exhaustive, here are some professions in South Africa that commonly require PI insurance: It is important to note that the requirement for PI insurance may vary based on regulatory bodies, professional associations, contractual obligations, and client demands within each profession. Professionals in these fields should consult with their respective industry…
Curator bonis is a legal term used in South Africa to refer to a person appointed by the court to manage the financial and legal affairs of someone who is unable to do so themselves due to mental incapacity or other reasons. The curator bonis acts as a legal representative and fiduciary for the person…